Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#54618 - [alsa-lib] license should be "LGPL" or "LGPL or GPL"
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alexandre Bique (babali) - Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 11:42 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 21:42 GMT
Opened by Alexandre Bique (babali) - Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 11:42 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 21:42 GMT
|
DetailsHi,
pacman -Qi alsa-lib tells me that the library is GPL which is not true as it is also LGPL. I think that when both options are there, it is preferable to choose LGPL, or clearly state that both options are available. Alex. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 21:42 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Changed in svn trunk. COPYING file inside the released tarball specifies LGPL 2.1 or later, so this will be LGPL.
Wednesday, 28 June 2017, 21:42 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Changed in svn trunk. COPYING file inside the released tarball specifies LGPL 2.1 or later, so this will be LGPL.