Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#54593 - [ghc] Move .hi from ghc to ghc-static
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Phil Ruffwind (Rufflewind) - Monday, 26 June 2017, 00:46 GMT
Last edited by Felix Yan (felixonmars) - Thursday, 21 September 2017, 18:05 GMT
Opened by Phil Ruffwind (Rufflewind) - Monday, 26 June 2017, 00:46 GMT
Last edited by Felix Yan (felixonmars) - Thursday, 21 September 2017, 18:05 GMT
|
DetailsNow that ghc has been split, I think it would be better to finish the job by moving the *.hi files to ghc-static. They don't seem to be needed by the dynamic libraries (which have their own *.dyn_hi extension.) This is reduces the bloat of 'ghc' further (~60MiB), and IMO also improves the error messages when the -dynamic flag is missing.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Felix Yan (felixonmars)
Thursday, 21 September 2017, 18:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Thursday, 21 September 2017, 18:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Instead of moving the .hi files, I would say moving HTML docs and the "ghc" library would help more :)