Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#54575 - [qtcreator] consider disabling the webengine based help
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Norbert Pfeiler (npfeiler) - Saturday, 24 June 2017, 16:19 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Tuesday, 04 July 2017, 12:34 GMT
Opened by Norbert Pfeiler (npfeiler) - Saturday, 24 June 2017, 16:19 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Tuesday, 04 July 2017, 12:34 GMT
|
DetailsJump to anchor in the webengine based help neither works via F1 from the source code nor from the index links in the help view.
This makes it pretty frustrating to work with. Consider adding something like this to prepare() to force the non-webengine based help viewer instead: sed -e 's/!isEmpty(QT.webenginewidgets.name)/webenginehelpplugin/' -i qt-creator-opensource-src-${pkgver}/src/plugins/help/help.pro |
This task depends upon
Closed by Antonio Rojas (arojas)
Tuesday, 04 July 2017, 12:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qt5-base 5.9.1-2
Tuesday, 04 July 2017, 12:34 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: qt5-base 5.9.1-2

Have you reported the problem upstream? If there's an issue it should be fixed, not worked around by disabling features.

https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-18448

The question is if optics are a more important feature than functionality. Because that’s the only thing webengine contributes.