Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#54517 - [pacman-contrib] paccache does not use default option on -k
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Richard Neumann (rne) - Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 09:14 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 13:43 GMT
Opened by Richard Neumann (rne) - Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 09:14 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 13:43 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
paccache does not default to "3" on option "-k" as described in "paccache --help". Additional info: * pacman 5.0.2-1 Steps to reproduce: 1) Run $ paccache --help 2) Read '-k, --keep <num> keep "num" of each package in the cache (default: 3).'. 3) Run $ paccache -ruk 4) Expect behavior of "paccache -ruk 3". 5) Get "paccache: option requires an argument -- 'k'" instead. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 13:43 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: working as documented.
Tuesday, 20 June 2017, 13:43 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: working as documented.
Still, it seems weird that paccache then obviously keeps stuff even if I do not supply the --keep argument, and thus, if I do not want to keep anything I'd have to tell it to keep stuff with an amount of zero, right?
Since I now understand how to use paccache for my purpose you may want to close this as "not a bug" as a case of PEBKAC. ;)