FS#5430 - amule doesn't start: missing lib

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Brice (bricem13) - Thursday, 21 September 2006, 19:13 GMT
Last edited by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Friday, 31 August 2007, 15:11 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Jan de Groot (JGC)
Architecture All
Severity Critical
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 2
Private No

Details

Since the binutils update to 2.17, amule doesn't start!

[brice@TuxBox:lib]$ amule
amule: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.16.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[brice@TuxBox:lib]$


Regards, Brice
This task depends upon

Closed by  Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Friday, 31 August 2007, 15:11 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  no response - seems ok
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Tuesday, 03 July 2007, 14:33 GMT
Reopened on this request:
507:cromo@kromka:~$ amule
amule: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.17.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Tuesday, 03 July 2007, 17:11 GMT
This is an issue with binutils from testing. As quick fix you could symlink it for now, as it's actually a bug in applications that link dynamically to libbfd. libbfd is not API stable so programs should link to the static version of this lib. The next upload of amule will link to the static library, which means we won't get these upgrade bugs anymore for binutils.
Comment by Dawid Wróbel (cromo) - Tuesday, 03 July 2007, 17:29 GMT
I see. Thanks for explaination.
Comment by Warren Dumortier (elwario91) - Wednesday, 04 July 2007, 12:39 GMT
aMule didn't work but with a full update of the system it worked again.
But don't know if it didn't start due to the same problem.
Comment by Alex (f4e) - Monday, 13 August 2007, 22:27 GMT
This resolved the problem for me:
ln /usr/lib/libbfd-2.17.50.0.17.so /usr/lib/libbfd-2.17.so
Comment by Dawid Wróbel (cromo) - Monday, 13 August 2007, 23:27 GMT
Alex, it's a workaround and not exactly a fix of this bug.
Comment by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Tuesday, 14 August 2007, 12:59 GMT
i686 rebuild against newest binutils on the way
Comment by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Tuesday, 14 August 2007, 13:08 GMT
-4 is up - i686 should be fine now

Loading...