Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#53914 - [rocksndiamonds] rockndiamonds is built against SDL 1 instead of SDL 2
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Sami B. (spider-mario) - Tuesday, 02 May 2017, 22:49 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 03 May 2017, 13:54 GMT
Opened by Sami B. (spider-mario) - Tuesday, 02 May 2017, 22:49 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 03 May 2017, 13:54 GMT
|
Details https://www.artsoft.org/rocksndiamonds/download/#compiling-from-source says: “SDL 1.2 and SDL 2.0 are both supported, but SDL 2.0 is highly recommended”, but the Arch package is currently built against SDL 1.2, presumably because SDL 2 is not installed on the machine used for building the package (the Makefile tests whether sdl2-config is usable to determine which version to use).
Would it be possible to build it against SDL 2 instead? It provides additional features, for example resizing and scaling of the game window. (Also, the dependency against smpeg seems to be obsolete.) |
This task depends upon