Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#52950 - [pkgbuild-introspection] Remove package
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 13 February 2017, 16:33 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 31 December 2017, 17:39 GMT
Opened by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 13 February 2017, 16:33 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 31 December 2017, 17:39 GMT
|
Detailsmkaurball is completely obsolete since the AUR switched to git. mksrcinfo is now taken care of directly by pacman. This really doesn't do much useful anymore that can't be done by a very simple alias.
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Sunday, 31 December 2017, 17:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Removed from [community]
Sunday, 31 December 2017, 17:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Removed from [community]
I'd like to employ it in the build system for i686, because it's faster than makepkg.
btw: the source seems to be offline - where do I report upstream bugs?
cheers,
Erich
@deepthought,
https://pkgbuild.com/~dreisner/sources/pkgbuild-introspection/
And of course the upstream url.
But this unbuildable source should really be updated in the PKGBUILD if we aren't going to pull it entirely.