Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#52862 - [liblphobos] PLEASE ENTER SUMMARY
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ben Reis (unbeliever536) - Monday, 06 February 2017, 00:01 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Tuesday, 07 February 2017, 23:50 GMT
Opened by Ben Reis (unbeliever536) - Monday, 06 February 2017, 00:01 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Tuesday, 07 February 2017, 23:50 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
LDC has an option to compile for i686, but needs 32-bit standard libraries (eg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-liblphobos/) in order to do so. These should probably be packaged in multilib. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Tuesday, 07 February 2017, 23:30 GMT
What's wrong with them being in the AUR?
Comment by Ben Reis (unbeliever536) -
Tuesday, 07 February 2017, 23:35 GMT
It's a little weird for me to have the standard library straddling the AUR and the official repos. It's not horrible, but it seems awkward. The 32-bit standard library is effectively an optional dependency for ldc (if you want to compile for 32 bit machines), and I think it should be packaged as such.