Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#5285 - udev 097 does not create /dev/raw1394 required by libraw1394

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Peter Galiovsky (galiyosha) - Friday, 25 August 2006, 12:20 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Current
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

udev 097-1 does not create the /dev/raw1394 device required for libraw1394 to work. /dev/raw/raw1394 is created instead. As "/dev/raw1394" is hardcoded in libraw1394, a symlink to /dev/raw/raw1394 should probably be created in /dev. In udev 096-1, only a /dev/raw1394 device was created.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Saturday, 26 August 2006, 11:01 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 26 August 2006, 09:59 GMT
would you please try this udev.rules file?
Comment by Peter Galiovsky (galiyosha) - Saturday, 26 August 2006, 10:27 GMT
That seems to work the "096 way" -- it creates /dev/raw1394, but no /dev/raw/raw1394. Does anything need/use /dev/raw/raw1394 (unfortunately I have no idea) or is the new path preferred?

When I asked about this on forums, lanrat suggested to add a separate rules file with:
KERNEL=="raw1394", SYMLINK+="%k"
This left the /dev/raw/raw1394 in place and created a symlink to it in /dev/raw1394. libraw1394 worked fine.
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 26 August 2006, 10:57 GMT
no i think it was just an error in rules file, other distros add the %k parameter too, i just missed it.
seems 096 is bugged that is misiniterprets the rule

Loading...