Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#5264 - jdk and jre have same description text
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Michael Towers (gradgrind) - Monday, 21 August 2006, 07:36 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 16 June 2007, 08:08 GMT
Opened by Michael Towers (gradgrind) - Monday, 21 August 2006, 07:36 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 16 June 2007, 08:08 GMT
|
Detailsjdk should have some more appropriate description.
And shouldn't it depend on jre? |
This task depends upon
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Monday, 21 August 2006, 08:01 GMT
Yes, and shouldn't the LICENSE message be changed to the new license structure we have (/usr/share/licenses?)
Comment by David Fuhr (dcf) -
Tuesday, 17 October 2006, 11:27 GMT
Yes, JDK depends on JRE, but dependency is missing... i think this should be assigned to Jason Chu - the maintainer for jdk/jre