FS#5264 - jdk and jre have same description text

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Michael Towers (gradgrind) - Monday, 21 August 2006, 07:36 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 16 June 2007, 08:08 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category System
Status Closed
Assigned To Jason Chu (jason)
Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

jdk should have some more appropriate description.

And shouldn't it depend on jre?
This task depends upon

Closed by  Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Saturday, 16 June 2007, 08:08 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 21 August 2006, 08:01 GMT
Yes, and shouldn't the LICENSE message be changed to the new license structure we have (/usr/share/licenses?)
Comment by David Fuhr (dcf) - Tuesday, 17 October 2006, 11:27 GMT
Yes, JDK depends on JRE, but dependency is missing... i think this should be assigned to Jason Chu - the maintainer for jdk/jre

Loading...