Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#51952 - [python2-twisted] [python2-incremental] Dependency cycle
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by kkl2401 (kkl2401) - Thursday, 24 November 2016, 22:27 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Friday, 25 November 2016, 02:54 GMT
Opened by kkl2401 (kkl2401) - Thursday, 24 November 2016, 22:27 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Friday, 25 November 2016, 02:54 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Currently, packages python2-twisted and python2-incremental depend on each other. Additional info: Name : python2-twisted Version : 16.5.0-1 Name : python2-incremental Version : 16.10.1-1 Steps to reproduce: # pacman -Syu :: Starting full system upgrade... resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages... warning: dependency cycle detected: warning: python2-incremental will be installed before its python2-twisted dependency |
This task depends upon
Closed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Friday, 25 November 2016, 02:54 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Actual dependency cycle, and causes no issues.
Friday, 25 November 2016, 02:54 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Actual dependency cycle, and causes no issues.
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Friday, 25 November 2016, 00:03 GMT
Ok. Why is this a problem?
Comment by kkl2401 (kkl2401) -
Friday, 25 November 2016, 01:10 GMT
I thought such dependencies were to be avoided (and thinking back I don't remember seeing this warning in years). But if I'm wrong and it is considered OK, then let's close the issue.