Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#51596 - [pfff] all binaries don't work
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by hexchain (hexchain) - Monday, 31 October 2016, 05:45 GMT
Last edited by Massimiliano Torromeo (mtorromeo) - Monday, 31 October 2016, 13:32 GMT
Opened by hexchain (hexchain) - Monday, 31 October 2016, 05:45 GMT
Last edited by Massimiliano Torromeo (mtorromeo) - Monday, 31 October 2016, 13:32 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
It seems that all binaries in community/pfff don't work. ~ $ pacman -Ql pfff | grep '/usr/bin' pfff /usr/bin/ pfff /usr/bin/codequery pfff /usr/bin/codeslicer pfff /usr/bin/pfff pfff /usr/bin/pfff_db pfff /usr/bin/pfff_test pfff /usr/bin/scheck pfff /usr/bin/sgrep pfff /usr/bin/spatch pfff /usr/bin/stags $ codequery No bytecode file specified. $ codeslicer No bytecode file specified. $ pfff No bytecode file specified. $ pfff_db No bytecode file specified. $ pfff_test No bytecode file specified. $ scheck No bytecode file specified. $ sgrep No bytecode file specified. $ spatch No bytecode file specified. $ stags No bytecode file specified. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. $ pacman -Q pfff ocaml camlp4 community/pfff 0.29-4 extra/ocaml 4.03.0-1 community/camlp4 4.03+1-1 $ stags -version The OCaml runtime, version 4.03.0 $ pacman -Qql pfff | grep '/usr/bin/.' | xargs md5sum | sort 3b8fc1f138373b95607c130840c5d456 /usr/bin/pfff 3b8fc1f138373b95607c130840c5d456 /usr/bin/sgrep 3b8fc1f138373b95607c130840c5d456 /usr/bin/spatch bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/codequery bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/codeslicer bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/pfff_db bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/pfff_test bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/scheck bd68aafdd13f7a9a7be42fbdc6402995 /usr/bin/stags It seems that some of them are totally identical. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Massimiliano Torromeo (mtorromeo)
Monday, 31 October 2016, 13:32 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pfff-0.29-5
Monday, 31 October 2016, 13:32 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pfff-0.29-5