Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#50892 - [the_silver_searcher] PLEASE ENTER SUMMARY
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by michael Lojkovic (zerophase) - Monday, 26 September 2016, 07:51 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 26 September 2016, 23:15 GMT
Opened by michael Lojkovic (zerophase) - Monday, 26 September 2016, 07:51 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Monday, 26 September 2016, 23:15 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
message about invalid or corrupted PGP signature when attempting to update to the latest version with pacmatic. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Monday, 26 September 2016, 13:55 GMT
I don't care about the title, but you didn't include any real information. I just checked it, and the signature is fine.
Comment by michael Lojkovic (zerophase) -
Monday, 26 September 2016, 20:02 GMT
It works for me know too. It was only for the x86_64 version. Looks like whatever corrupted the package was fixed.