Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#50293 - Complie imagemagick with 32 bit depth.

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Siddharth J Singh (dante666) - Sunday, 07 August 2016, 08:05 GMT
Last edited by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Sunday, 07 August 2016, 09:15 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture x86_64
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
Compiling imagemagick --with-quantum-depth=16 results in the following warning in octave. Can we compile it using 32 bit depth?
http://wiki.octave.org/GraphicsMagick
(Please note that in the site it shows 8 bit depth and the solution is to compile with 16 bit depth. Probably for older times.)

>>warning: your version of GraphicsMagick limits images to 16 bits per pixel"
>>warning: called from
>> imformats>default_formats at line 256 column 11
>> imformats at line 79 column 3
>> imageIO at line 106 column 11
>> imread at line 106 column 30

Additional info:
* imagemagick version 6.9.5.4-1

Steps to reproduce:
1) Start Octave(tested with 4.0.3)
2) run imread("image.jpg")
This task depends upon

Closed by  Antonio Rojas (arojas)
Sunday, 07 August 2016, 09:15 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) - Sunday, 07 August 2016, 08:36 GMT
so, are you talking about imagemagick or about graphicsmagick? Because they are different things.
Comment by Siddharth J Singh (dante666) - Sunday, 07 August 2016, 09:11 GMT
Yes, you are correct. My mistake, I got really confused. Closing!!

Loading...