Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#49735 - [sdcc] conflicts with core/binutils 2.26
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Ondřej Hruška (MightyPork) - Thursday, 16 June 2016, 14:43 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 17 June 2016, 10:54 GMT
Opened by Ondřej Hruška (MightyPork) - Thursday, 16 June 2016, 14:43 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Friday, 17 June 2016, 10:54 GMT
|
Details~ $ paci sdcc
resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages... Packages (1) sdcc-3.6.0-1 Total Installed Size: 279.13 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 117.41 MiB :: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y (1/1) checking keys in keyring [###################################################] 100% (1/1) checking package integrity [###################################################] 100% (1/1) loading package files [###################################################] 100% (1/1) checking for file conflicts [###################################################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) sdcc: /usr/share/info/bfd.info.gz exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. ~ $ pacown /usr/share/info/bfd.info.gz /usr/share/info/bfd.info.gz is owned by binutils 2.26-4 seems the file /usr/share/info/bfd.info.gz is provided by both packages which produces a conflict. |
This task depends upon