Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#49544 - Better descriptions for packages.
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Mattias Andrée (maandree) - Thursday, 02 June 2016, 18:18 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Saturday, 04 June 2016, 16:00 GMT
Opened by Mattias Andrée (maandree) - Thursday, 02 June 2016, 18:18 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Saturday, 04 June 2016, 16:00 GMT
|
DetailsPackages have too poor descriptions.
I was told to report each package individually, but come on, that too much work, but feel free to do that yourselves. Attached is a list of all the offending A:s in core, extra, and community with suggetions. Also, try to make descriptive descriptions for font and icon packages. This is probably a hard one, and screenshots would probably be more helpful. There is also a lack of consistence in the mode of the descriptions. You should look into that too. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) -
Saturday, 04 June 2016, 16:00 GMT
I just scanned the list, the ones I saw were no real change. Again, if you have a specific gripe with a pkgdesc, file a bug against that package. Don't just make minor wording changes that change nothing.
pkg-the-bad-and-the-ulgy-part...