Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#48777 - [numix-themes] No icon for gnome-books

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Britt Yazel (brittyazel) - Thursday, 31 March 2016, 20:55 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Sunday, 10 April 2016, 17:47 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Gnome-books is not obeying 3rd party icon themes, I.E. when I set my theme to Numix, the gnome-books icon stays the default. I believe I know why.

In the org.gnome.Books.desktop icon is set to "org.gnome.books", whereas for 3rd party icon themes to work properly this value needs to be set to "gnome-books".

Now, I have asked the folks at Numix to add a link from "gnome-books" icon to "org.gnome.books", but I am not sure if it is their job to work better with Arch .desktop files, or our job to work better with custom themes.

If this is not an Arch issue please feel free to close.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Sunday, 10 April 2016, 17:47 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  2.5.1.r154.9c9bf64
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 31 March 2016, 21:44 GMT
What the hell is gnome-books?
Comment by Britt Yazel (brittyazel) - Thursday, 31 March 2016, 21:45 GMT
One of the many, single use Gnome programs. It's packaged within Gnome-Documents as far as I can tell
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 31 March 2016, 22:17 GMT
Ah yes, gnome-documents. Looking at it, the .desktop file comes from upstream, so this is a Numix issue. I'm going to move it there, even though it's already fixed upstream. Our package still wouldn't work.
Comment by Britt Yazel (brittyazel) - Thursday, 31 March 2016, 22:28 GMT

Loading...