FS#48722 - [openra] install output is misleading
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Matthias Mailänder (Mailaender) - Monday, 28 March 2016, 08:58 GMT
Last edited by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Monday, 28 March 2016, 19:49 GMT
Opened by Matthias Mailänder (Mailaender) - Monday, 28 March 2016, 08:58 GMT
Last edited by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Monday, 28 March 2016, 19:49 GMT
|
Details
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/openra.install?h=packages/openra
is spreading outdated information. The Cg renderer was
removed 2 years ago in
https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/5235
I suggest you add the man page to the package using >>make install-man-page prefix=/usr DESTDIR="$pkgdir"<< instead of hard-coding documentation into the packaging scripts. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jelle van der Waa (jelly)
Monday, 28 March 2016, 19:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 20151224-3
Monday, 28 March 2016, 19:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 20151224-3
Comment by
Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Monday,
28 March 2016, 15:44 GMT
Fixed the renderer information in openra-20151224-2. What about
the man pages? You mean we don't install the man pages by default?
Comment by
Matthias Mailänder (Mailaender) -
Monday, 28 March 2016, 18:51 GMT
No, but you could. They were added last year
https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/8247
upstream.
Comment by
Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Monday,
28 March 2016, 19:48 GMT
Why not, I added it in -3