Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#48281 - [systemd] timer unit OnCalendar calculates wrong execution date

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Manfred Miederer (LessWire) - Sunday, 21 February 2016, 02:19 GMT
Last edited by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Monday, 22 February 2016, 12:36 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Thomas B├Ąchler (brain0)
Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
This happens at least using CET time (24 hours) and a timer controlled service which uses 'OnCalendar='

Example:

Let's say current date and time is:
Sunday, 9:00 CET

Unit file 'test.timer' contains:
[code]

[Unit]
...
[Timer]
OnCalendar=Sun 16:00:00

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
[/code]

The corresponding 'test.service' should be executed 7 hours later but it don't! 'systemctl list-timers' shows next execution for a week later (Sunday next week and not for today).

This happens with systemd 229-2, downgrading to 228-4 helps and it works fine.

This task depends upon

Closed by  Dave Reisner (falconindy)
Monday, 22 February 2016, 12:36 GMT
Reason for closing:  Upstream
Additional comments about closing:  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issue s/2682
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 21 February 2016, 14:55 GMT
Please report this upstream.
Comment by Manfred Miederer (LessWire) - Sunday, 21 February 2016, 16:42 GMT
Ok, i did.
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 21 February 2016, 18:20 GMT
And the link you were supposed to include with that seems like it might be this one: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2682
Comment by Manfred Miederer (LessWire) - Sunday, 21 February 2016, 18:27 GMT
That's right, thanks.

Loading...