Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#47819 - [bash] PKGBUILD incorrect md5sum list
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by tim handojo (thandojo) - Tuesday, 19 January 2016, 20:20 GMT
Last edited by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Wednesday, 09 November 2016, 16:16 GMT
Opened by tim handojo (thandojo) - Tuesday, 19 January 2016, 20:20 GMT
Last edited by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Wednesday, 09 November 2016, 16:16 GMT
|
DetailsI noticed an error in the PKGBUILD of bash package.
It seems that one of the md5sum on the list (under md5sums variable) is inconsistent with the fetched file. This had caused a failure in the verification process. Other items seemed to be unaffected (I had skimmed thru this list and compare it to the checksums of given files). It seemed that only the last file (bash43-042) has this problem. Either this file has been changed recently or a mistake has occured. Either way, it's messed up. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion)
Wednesday, 09 November 2016, 16:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: bash 4.4-1
Wednesday, 09 November 2016, 16:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: bash 4.4-1
Comment by Nils Bars (noEntry) -
Tuesday, 17 May 2016, 10:43 GMT
Would be nice if the maintainer would fix this.
Comment by Levente Polyak (anthraxx) -
Tuesday, 17 May 2016, 16:09 GMT
I have also noticed that some time ago while doing some reproducible builds tests. As it felt kind of suspicious, I have checked the difference between the currently distributed patchset and the old one our PKGBUILD was based on, seems like upstream has slightly changes the patch by applying it to another file. Bah, really a horrible habit to alter already shipped patches!