Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#47750 - [lxterminal] add dependency on libutempter; log to utmp and wtmp ('w', 'who', last entries)
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by jb (jb.1234abcd) - Thursday, 14 January 2016, 14:31 GMT
Last edited by Balló György (City-busz) - Wednesday, 17 February 2016, 12:08 GMT
Opened by jb (jb.1234abcd) - Thursday, 14 January 2016, 14:31 GMT
Last edited by Balló György (City-busz) - Wednesday, 17 February 2016, 12:08 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
LXDE's lxterminal does not do the updates. It is a semi-security issue, at least for some users. Additional info: * package version(s) lxterminal 0.2.0-1 * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: Make sure it exists: $ ls -al /var/run/utmp -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 0 Jan 14 13:21 /var/run/utmp $ w; who; last |
This task depends upon
Closed by Balló György (City-busz)
Wednesday, 17 February 2016, 12:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: Submitted feature request to LXDE.
Wednesday, 17 February 2016, 12:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: Submitted feature request to LXDE.
If you're relying on utmp/wtmp for security, you really need to rethink things.
$ ldd `which xterm`
...
libutempter.so.0 => /usr/lib/libutempter.so.0 (0x00007f658d8b3000)
...
All other terminals do the right thing as well, so the consistency is desired.
Some users or sysadmins set them up as login terminals, scripts may rely on consistent output of "w', 'who', 'last' entries.
I think you should open an upstream feature request, if you want this to be implemented:
https://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/feature-requests/
https://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/feature-requests/292/