Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#47709 - not shown [installed] flag near the optional dependencies
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Stas Gromov (kullfar) - Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:13 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:25 GMT
Opened by Stas Gromov (kullfar) - Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:13 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:25 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
not shown [installed] flag near the optional dependencies Steps to Reproduce: I have installed package gcc-multilib 5.3.0-3 (multilib-devel) https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/gcc-multilib/ And it "Provides: gcc=5.3.0-3" So, I do not have gcc package in the system. Next step. I have xorg-xrdb installed. $ pacman -Qi xorg-xrdb Name : xorg-xrdb Version : 1.1.0-2 ... Optional Deps : gcc: for preprocessing mcpp: a lightweight alternative for preprocessing [installed] ... Here you can see optional dep "gcc" without "installed" flag. But seems it should be here. right? ps. $ pacman -Qi pacman Name : pacman Version : 4.2.1-4 ... |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:25 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing: FS#36412
Monday, 11 January 2016, 12:25 GMT
Reason for closing: Duplicate
Additional comments about closing:
The link "Bug Reports" on the https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/pacman/
leads me to the https://bugs.archlinux.org/?project=1&cat[]=31&string=pacman
and there are no any similar bug on this page.
Cause it's about package, and I should go to the "upstream" to check for similar bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=3&do=index&switch=1