Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#47687 - [poppler] consider using openjpeg2 instead of openjpeg1
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Hussam Al-Tayeb (hussam) - Sunday, 10 January 2016, 06:25 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Thursday, 17 March 2016, 20:16 GMT
Opened by Hussam Al-Tayeb (hussam) - Sunday, 10 January 2016, 06:25 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Thursday, 17 March 2016, 20:16 GMT
|
DetailsI'm not sure if there are any regressions compared to openjpeg1 but it looks like Fedora does this by using the configure option --enable-libopenjpeg=openjpeg2.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/poppler.git/tree/poppler.spec#n164 Imagemagick package uses openjpeg2 as well. |
This task depends upon
I don't see any advantage switching to openjpeg2. Upstream is still recommending openjpeg(1).
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/254
But Ok :)
Feel free to close this bug report if you wish.
Better stay on the safe side since poppler build system chooses openjpeg1 with both installed.
in speed or image quality. So I'm for staying on the safe side and keep it until you show any advantage in this transition.