Welcome to the Pacman bug tracker. Please search the current bugs and feature requests before filing a new one! Use advanced search and select "Search in Comments".

* Please select the correct category and version.
* Write a descriptive summary, background info, and provide a reproducible test case whenever possible.

FS#47627 - pacman's 'import key' prompt does not stop installation from failing and generates confusing message

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Mingye Wang (arthur2e5) - Tuesday, 05 January 2016, 04:43 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 29 December 2020, 13:39 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category General
Status Unconfirmed
Assigned To Allan McRae (Allan)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 4.2.1
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 0%
Votes 0
Private No


Summary and Info:

When installing a package with a never-imported key, pacman (uh, well, libalpm _alpm_key_import) will ask the user if the key should be imported. However, it still does not trust the imported key which (according to quininer (via tox tunnel) at is responsible for a following "'<FILENAME>': invalid or corrupt package (PGP sig)" error.

If this is really caused by the key being untrusted, then pacman should use another message like `Signature from untrusted key blah blah .. continue?' instead of telling the user the package is broken.

I am not quite an Archlinux user, and some extra verification should be used on this report to make sure both quininer and I aren't wrong. @LastAvengers (via telegram tunnel) reported this error to quininer in, so you might be able to get extra info from them.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a random package from third-party sources like archlinux-cn's. In this case the package filename appears to be 'ydcv-rs-git-'.
- In this case, the imported key wasn't able to get enough trust from the Web of Trust. A prompt should be added anyway.
2. Pacman should now ask you if you want to import the key. Y.
3. BOOM.
This task depends upon

Comment by Mingye Wang (arthur2e5) - Tuesday, 05 January 2016, 04:48 GMT