FS#4744 - loading package data... load_pkg: missing package name in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/[...]

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 00:40 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Wednesday, 03 January 2007, 23:19 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture not specified
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.2 Gimmick
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

This task depends upon

This task blocks these from closing
 FS#6316 - Pacman 3 release bugcatcher 
Closed by  Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Monday, 12 February 2007, 00:24 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Additional comments about closing:  This is a not really a pacman bug, but a corruption issue
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 00:43 GMT
kris|~/ies4linux-2.0beta6$ sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
:: current is up to date
error: anonymous login failed
:: extra is up to date
error: anonymous login failed
:: unstable is up to date
:: community is up to date
shadowhand [################] 100% 4K 8.0K/s 00:00:00
:: testing is up to date
:: gvim: local (7.0-1) appears to be newer than repo (current/6.4-3)
:: hawknl: local (168-1) appears to be newer than repo (community/1.68-1)
:: nvidia: local (1.0.8762-1) appears to be newer than repo (extra/1.0.8178-16)
:: opera-devel: local (20060502.6-1) appears to be newer than repo (shadowhand/9.0b2-1)
:: vim: local (7.0-1) appears to be newer than repo (current/6.4-2)
:: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>'

Targets: gnome-common-2.12.0-4 gstreamer0.10-bad-0.10.3-1
gstreamer0.10-swfdec-0.10.3-1 libxfce4util-4.2.3.2-3

Total Package Size: 0.4 MB

Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n]

checking package integrity... done.
loading package data... load_pkg: missing package name in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/gnome-common-2.12.0-4.pkg.tar.gz.
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 00:44 GMT
this happened first with wine btw(sudo pacman -S wine), after i had removed .wine and winetools directories aswell as pacman -R wine, pacman -R winetools

maybe that means something...
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 00:45 GMT
sudo pacman -Scc doesn't work either..
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 07:08 GMT
After a reboot it worked? looks like you have filesystem corruption or so. About the suspicious processes you couldn't kill: those are kernel processes you can't kill.
Comment by kongokris 2 (nut543) - Wednesday, 31 May 2006, 15:14 GMT
yeah i'd think so too. The reason i knew it worked after a reebot is because iv'e had the problem once before. Hovewer if it was a fs corruption i would have seen it "fixing it" on bootup no? That means i should have seen it in dmesg; but i'm not.

kris|~$ dmesg|grep -4 XFS
hda: 234441648 sectors (120034 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, UDMA(100)
hda: cache flushes supported
hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
ide-floppy driver 0.99.newide
SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block numbers, no debug enabled
SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
XFS mounting filesystem hda6
Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: hda6
Freeing unused kernel memory: 244k freed
usbcore: registered new driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new driver hub
USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v2.3

If that were the case it also means atleast 1, probably 2 and possibly everyone of the above thread people also should have had such a corruption.

The reason I listed the [pdflush] entries is because i usually never have them, if I remember correctly then I had them the last time I had this problem as well.
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Friday, 09 February 2007, 16:34 GMT
Status in the latest Pacman3 RC?
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Friday, 09 February 2007, 16:42 GMT
It appears the original bug is related to filesystem corruption

EDIT: Ignore that - package validation is on -A/-U operations. Still, pacman does validate with md5sums, but there's really nothing we can do about filesystem corruption.

I think this is closable.

Loading...