Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#47312 - kicad-library should Conflict with kicad-library-bzr
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by George (gh403) - Wednesday, 09 December 2015, 22:17 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Thursday, 10 December 2015, 00:14 GMT
Opened by George (gh403) - Wednesday, 09 December 2015, 22:17 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Thursday, 10 December 2015, 00:14 GMT
|
DetailsThe package kicad-library-4.0.0-1 conflicts with the package kicad-library-bzr-240-2, but the packages' metadata do not reflect this. Attempting to install them both at once results in an error. The kicad-library-bzr package should probably just be moved (back?) to the AUR, since kicad-library has been updated to 4.0.0. In any case, the Conflicts field should be set appropriately in the packages' headers.
Steps to reproduce: * Install kicad-library-bzr, version 240-2 as of this writing * Attempt to install kicad-library, version 4.0.0-1 (pacman complains about existing files) |
This task depends upon
Closed by Kyle Keen (keenerd)
Thursday, 10 December 2015, 00:14 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: kicad-library-bzr-240-2 removed.
Thursday, 10 December 2015, 00:14 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: kicad-library-bzr-240-2 removed.
Comment by Kyle Keen (keenerd) -
Wednesday, 09 December 2015, 22:59 GMT
No, kicad-library-bzr should simply be deleted.