Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#47262 - [words] 2.1-3 incompatible with util-linux 2.27.1-1
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Robert Ross (rob_ross) - Friday, 04 December 2015, 15:58 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Friday, 11 December 2015, 21:49 GMT
Opened by Robert Ross (rob_ross) - Friday, 04 December 2015, 15:58 GMT
Last edited by Kyle Keen (keenerd) - Friday, 11 December 2015, 21:49 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
When "words" links to "/usr/share/dict/usa", running "look exa" results in no output. In contrast, running "look exa /usr/share/dict/words" produces the expected 66 lines. According to the look(1) man page, "/usr/share/dict/words" should be sorted with the -d and -f options. An ALPM-SCRIPTLET based on the following allows this "look exa" to work: cd /usr/share/dict mv american-english american-english.bak LC_ALL=C sort -d -f american-english.bak > american-english I don't think this is an upstream-only issue because other distros have different sort requirements. For example, the "look.1.gz" in a tarball from "https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/bsdmainutils/download" indicates that Debian's "look" does not use binary search by default. Additional info: * util-linux 2.27.1-1 * words 2.1-3 Steps to reproduce: Run "look exa" in a terminal. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Kyle Keen (keenerd)
Friday, 11 December 2015, 21:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: words-2.1-4
Friday, 11 December 2015, 21:49 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: words-2.1-4
Comment by Kyle Keen (keenerd) -
Friday, 11 December 2015, 21:23 GMT
Sure, let's give this a whirl. I wasn't sure what a good sorting would have been originally anyway.