Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#46831 - [udns] Missing dependency on glibc

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Felix Yan (felixonmars) - Thursday, 22 October 2015, 15:49 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 22 October 2015, 23:16 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Christian Hesse (eworm)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
glibc should be listed as dependency:

udns E: Dependency glibc detected and not included (libraries ['usr/lib/libc.so.6'] needed in files ['usr/bin/rblcheck', 'usr/bin/dnsget', 'usr/lib/libudns.so.0', 'usr/bin/ex-rdns'])

Additional info:
* package version(s)
udns 0.4-2
This task depends upon

Closed by  Allan McRae (Allan)
Thursday, 22 October 2015, 23:16 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 22 October 2015, 16:13 GMT
Which goes back to the question nobody wants to talk about: Should packages implicitly depend on packages in the base group?
Comment by Christian Hesse (eworm) - Thursday, 22 October 2015, 17:08 GMT
Usually I do not add dependencies to packages in base group... We can expect to have glibc around, no?
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Thursday, 22 October 2015, 23:16 GMT
If you system does not have glibc, it does not boot. Or run anything...

Loading...