Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#46681 - {bugtracker} Upgrade to 1.0

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Peter Liscovius (peterdd) - Monday, 12 October 2015, 19:30 GMT
Last edited by Florian Pritz (bluewind) - Friday, 15 January 2016, 10:12 GMT
Task Type General Gripe
Category Web Sites
Status Closed
Assigned To Florian Pritz (bluewind)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 4.1.1
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Hello,

I'm one of the main contributors for Flyspray on github this year and found archlinux is using Flyspray as their bugtracker.

I would be glad if you guys check out the current Flyspray 1.0 Beta versions and give feedback. (positive, negative, recommendations, patches)

archlinux uses a modifed Flyspray version which uses LDAP. Parts of that code is copied to Flyspray source, but I have no experience/knowledge nor priority to complete that integration. So providing patches/tests for that integration would be great.

See https://github.com/Flyspray/flyspray

This task depends upon

Closed by  Florian Pritz (bluewind)
Friday, 15 January 2016, 10:12 GMT
Reason for closing:  No response
Comment by Lukas Fleischer (lfleischer) - Saturday, 17 October 2015, 13:21 GMT
  • Field changed: Attached to Project (AUR web interface → Arch Linux)
  • Field changed: Summary (Flyspray → [Flyspray] Upgrade to 1.0)
1. You attached this to the wrong project. This is the bug tracker for aurweb. Will move the ticket to the Arch Linux bug tracker.
2. As far as I know, we do not use a modifed version of Flyspray. And we certainly do not use LDAP.
3. Is the 1.0 release fairly stable already? Have you done a lot of testing already?

Loading...