Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#46414 - qgis-ltr suppose fcgi is installed

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Alberto Fanjul (albfan) - Wednesday, 23 September 2015, 23:42 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Saturday, 26 September 2015, 07:56 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description: build qgis-ltr is not possible because it tries to install a file only compiled when fcgi is installed and "WITH_SERVER" option is uncommented


Additional info:
* qgis-ltr
* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:

- Check fcgi is not installed
- makepkg
- Build package fail on fakeroot install phase because qgis_mapserv.fcgi is not compiled and cannot be copied
This task depends upon

Closed by  Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Saturday, 26 September 2015, 07:56 GMT
Reason for closing:  None
Additional comments about closing:  Packages in the AUR are unsupported.
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 24 September 2015, 03:30 GMT
Nothing here makes sense.
Comment by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 24 September 2015, 05:48 GMT
I'm now pretty sure that this is a report for an AUR package. If that's the case, you're in the wrong place.
Comment by Alberto Fanjul (albfan) - Saturday, 26 September 2015, 07:43 GMT
I do warn package maintainer.

What's the workflow to help a package to be polute and working? Others seems to detect same problem.

You can close this issue anyway, In the world of "I-solve-this-to-myself" I'm done. Just want to know how to help others.

I think on a git package workflow, someone with higher level than a TU, should allow other TU to change a package with obvious flaws, or we would get an AUR full of non-working packages.

Loading...