Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#46239 - [libjpeg-turbo] Badly described license.
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Matthew Sitton (dfanz0r) - Wednesday, 09 September 2015, 16:40 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:54 GMT
Opened by Matthew Sitton (dfanz0r) - Wednesday, 09 September 2015, 16:40 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:54 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
License is described incorrectly in the PKGBUILD. Additional info: As you can see here: https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/blob/master/LICENSE.txt They describe the licenses used as BSD-compatible(yet are custom I think?). Where as it is marked as custom, and GPL in the PKGBUILD... |
This task depends upon
Closed by Gaetan Bisson (vesath)
Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:54 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: in SVN
Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:54 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: in SVN
Comment by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) -
Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:52 GMT
Thanks for noticing! The release tarball does not contain LICENSE.txt so, for now, I'll rely on the "LEGAL ISSUES" part of the README file.
Comment by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) -
Thursday, 10 September 2015, 12:54 GMT
Ah, turns out it's already part of the README files I put under /usr/share/licenses/libjpeg-turbo so I just have to fix the PKGBUILD license array.