Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#45998 - [qupzilla] QT5 version not marked experamental
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Carl K (IMback) - Sunday, 16 August 2015, 13:20 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 24 September 2015, 13:48 GMT
Opened by Carl K (IMback) - Sunday, 16 August 2015, 13:20 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 24 September 2015, 13:48 GMT
|
DetailsThe QT4 version should be the default version of qupzilla and the QT5 version should be marked experamental.
Upstream dose not support the QT5 version of Qupzilla 1.8.6, and it has varius relatively severe bugs. see: https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/issues/1692 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Thursday, 24 September 2015, 13:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Thursday, 24 September 2015, 13:48 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Comment by Carl K (IMback) -
Sunday, 16 August 2015, 13:22 GMT
Im sorry please add [qupzilla] to the title
Comment by Antonio Rojas (arojas) -
Sunday, 16 August 2015, 14:58 GMT
That thread doesn't say that the Qt5 version is experimental. It says that the QtWebEngine port (which is not even released yet) is. Version 1.8.6 still uses QtWebkit.
Comment by Carl K (IMback) -
Sunday, 16 August 2015, 17:36 GMT
In this case there is some other upstream bug? and the Qupzilla upstream bug is valid?