Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#4581 - Java source is removed from j2sdk although it's useful

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Pierre renié (pir) - Saturday, 06 May 2006, 10:29 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 16 June 2007, 07:42 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Jason Chu (jason)
Architecture not specified
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.1 Noodle
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

In the end of the PKGBUILD of j2sdk there is this code :

for i in java/*; do
if [ -f $i ]; then rm -f $i; fi
done

The problem is that it removes the file src.zip that contains some useful informations used for example by Eclipse.

I'm sending the screenshots of Eclipse with and without src.zip.
   Eclipse-(with-src.zip).png (75.7 KiB)
   Eclipse-(without-src.zip).png (38.7 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Saturday, 16 June 2007, 07:42 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Jason Chu (jason) - Thursday, 20 July 2006, 16:03 GMT
It's definitely a tradeoff. If I include it, people complain because the package is too big (it adds about 25 meg to the jdk package). If I don't include it, people complain because eclipse et al benefit from it.

I'll re-read the distribution license and see if I can distribute the src.zip seperately.
Comment by Igor (cheer) - Sunday, 08 April 2007, 11:33 GMT
What is with the bug at this moment?
Comment by Pierre renié (pir) - Sunday, 08 April 2007, 15:38 GMT
Debian separates the different parts of the sun java package. See http://packages.debian.org/testing/source/sun-java5

And now java is GPL (since java6)
Comment by Jason Chu (jason) - Sunday, 08 April 2007, 18:35 GMT
I plan on just including it in the package, but I have to ask Andy a couple of questions about the jdk package first.
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 14 April 2007, 12:00 GMT
also reported here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5587
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Monday, 28 May 2007, 14:52 GMT
and again: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7283
Jason? ;-)
Comment by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Tuesday, 29 May 2007, 11:04 GMT
We should really include the sources. The jdk is meant for developers and those really need the sources.

Loading...