Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#45791 - [virtualbox] start VBoxClient in Virtualbox guest only
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Christian Hesse (eworm) - Monday, 27 July 2015, 07:52 GMT
Last edited by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Sunday, 13 March 2016, 12:36 GMT
Opened by Christian Hesse (eworm) - Monday, 27 July 2015, 07:52 GMT
Last edited by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu) - Sunday, 13 March 2016, 12:36 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Installing virtualbox-guest-utils on a non-Virtualbox system results in an error message popping up via libnotify: VBoxCLient: the VirtualBox kernel service is not running. Exiting. This is really annoying... As I use this on live media built with archiso uninstalling the package is not an option. The system should as well on Virtualbox and non-Virtualbox machines. The simplest solution is to use systemd-detect-virt to detect the virtualization and start within Virtualbox guest only. A proposed patch is attached. (Currently this will fail (or not start) with virtualbox 5.0.0 and guest virtualization set to 'kvm'. However everything is in place for system 223.) Additional info: virtualbox-guest-utils 5.0.0-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sébastien Luttringer (seblu)
Sunday, 13 March 2016, 12:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/14474
Sunday, 13 March 2016, 12:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/14474
0001-start-within-vbox-guest-...
As you also know, in Arch we try to not feature patch upstream code source. This is why I'm a bit reluctant; pushing your feature suggestion upstream is welcome.
Let's wait for a response...
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/14474
Should I close here and let the works done upstream? Or you prefer we do differently?
I need this for myself, but I can handle it just fine for now. ;)