Issue tracker moved to https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/issues
FS#45381 - Should packages be called "AUR" packages, instead of "Unsupported"
Attached to Project:
AUR web interface
Opened by (Det) - Thursday, 18 June 2015, 16:16 GMT
Last edited by Lukas Fleischer (lfleischer) - Saturday, 03 October 2015, 08:02 GMT
Opened by (Det) - Thursday, 18 June 2015, 16:16 GMT
Last edited by Lukas Fleischer (lfleischer) - Saturday, 03 October 2015, 08:02 GMT
|
DetailsThe home page mentions "Unsupported" in 3 instances (https://aur4.archlinux.org/):
• "DISCLAIMER: Unsupported packages are user produced content." • "Packages in unsupported" • "Unsupported packages are user produced content." Should these use "AUR", instead of the deprecated "Unsupported" naming? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Lukas Fleischer (lfleischer)
Saturday, 03 October 2015, 08:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 4.1.0.
Saturday, 03 October 2015, 08:02 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed in 4.1.0.
I assume the .po files are updated through a Transifex export?