Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#45263 - iwconfig fails to display Link Quality
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Fritz Reichwald (V155) - Monday, 08 June 2015, 13:10 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 11 June 2015, 15:23 GMT
Opened by Fritz Reichwald (V155) - Monday, 08 June 2015, 13:10 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 11 June 2015, 15:23 GMT
|
DetailsRunning latest stable arch and recognized that iwconfig does not display the
correct Link Quality and Signal Strength. I executed: »iwconfig wlp3s0« To compare it with another value I ran »iw wlp3s0 link« (there the field is called "signal") I also recognized that the output of iwconfig does not change over time for the 2 named Fields. To get more information I did: »strace iwconfig wlp3s0« and got: "ioctl(3, SIOCGIWSENS, 0x7fff82bf2ac0) = -1 EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not supported)" (And also for 2 other calls a 'not supported' Because latest iwconfig version is more than 1 year old there might be a change in the api in the meantime. Full strace output can be found here: https://paste.xinu.at/tLteE/ Some Versioninformation: Linux: 4.0.4-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri May 22 03:05:23 UTC 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux iwconfig: wireless_tools 30.pre9-1 (as a following error wireless_link_qual_perc in conky does not work too) Kind regards Fritz |
This task depends upon
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Monday, 08 June 2015, 17:35 GMT
Wireless-tools is deprecated and doesn't support all features in current drivers. Use iw instead.
Comment by Fritz Reichwald (V155) -
Tuesday, 09 June 2015, 10:17 GMT
Ok. Thanks for the answer and sry for the noise.