Arch Linux

Description:
Currently the filesystem package shipped static passwd/group/shadow/gshadow files and use some checking/updating functions to maintain a list of system users and groups including the systemd specific ones; meanwhile the systemd package also make use of systemd-sysusers in the install files. Could Arch completely switch to sysusers.d? It seems to me it would be much more neat that way. While the systemd package can ship a list of users to avoid some unwanted deps, other packages can also shipped their own specific confs and trigger the update (instead of creating them with useradd/groupadd in the install files).

Reminder for you to update filesystem later if you guys don't give a damn on this idea (as expected): currently systemd-journal-remote and systemd-journal-upload are not in filesystem in are required/created by systemd.

P.S. From what I've test (in cleaning up the filesystem package), dbus and uuidd are the only users/groups which is essential in Arch but not created by the upstream confs. Actually, just by the way, the bin/lib symlinks seems to be the only essential things in the filesystem package, many other stuff are either unnecessary or should be maintained in other specific package (or already are).


Additional info:
* package version(s)
* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce: