Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#45022 - [mono-basic][mono] file conflicts
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Kevin Dodd (Jesin) - Tuesday, 19 May 2015, 21:56 GMT
Last edited by Isenmann Daniel (ise) - Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 17:59 GMT
Opened by Kevin Dodd (Jesin) - Tuesday, 19 May 2015, 21:56 GMT
Last edited by Isenmann Daniel (ise) - Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 17:59 GMT
|
DetailsTwo files in mono-basic 3.8-1 conflict with files of the same names in the same locations in mono 4.0.1.28-1:
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) mono-basic: /usr/lib/mono/2.0/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll exists in filesystem mono-basic: /usr/lib/mono/4.0/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll exists in filesystem Steps to reproduce: attempt to install mono-basic on an up-to-date system. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Isenmann Daniel (ise)
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 17:59 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed with new mono-basic package
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 17:59 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Fixed with new mono-basic package
Comment by Kevin Dodd (Jesin) -
Tuesday, 19 May 2015, 22:04 GMT
I apologize for the lack of a summary in the title. I forgot to enter one before I submitted this bug report, and I cannot find any way to edit the title.
Comment by Albert Lienardi (albertlienardi) -
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 11:48 GMT
Mono-basic package is outdated.
Comment by Isenmann Daniel (ise) -
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 13:04 GMT
I know that it is outdated. Maybe that's the problem here. I will check this and will release a new version of mono-basic
Comment by Albert Lienardi (albertlienardi) -
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 13:20 GMT
Yes, sorry. I meant that the new release should solve the conflict, as it doesn't ship the two mentioned files anymore (and even more than those two). Mono is dropping support for the old frameworks. Reference: http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/releases/4.0.0/#dropped-support-for-old-frameworks
Comment by Isenmann Daniel (ise) -
Wednesday, 20 May 2015, 13:32 GMT
Exactly, I just built the new package but I can release it in the evening (in about 3-4 hours) only.