Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#44224 - [julia] Included test suite fails (cblas related?)
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Nicolas Bigaouette (big_gie) - Tuesday, 17 March 2015, 15:12 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Thursday, 26 March 2015, 19:16 GMT
Opened by Nicolas Bigaouette (big_gie) - Tuesday, 17 March 2015, 15:12 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Thursday, 26 March 2015, 19:16 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Julia's included tests suite fails. It fails trying to find cblas_cdotc_sub() function in libblas. Is it a packaging issue? Or a Julia issue with the specific version? Additional info: * package version(s): 0.3.6 Steps to reproduce: 1) Launch julia: $ julia _ _ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing (_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "help()" for help. | | | | | | |/ _` | | | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.3.6 (2015-02-17 22:12 UTC) _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | |__/ | x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu julia> 2) Run the tests suite: julia> Base.runtests() From worker 2: * linalg1 From worker 4: * linalg3 From worker 5: * linalg4 From worker 3: * linalg2 exception on 4: ERROR: ccall: could not find function cblas_cdotc_sub in library libblas in dotc at linalg/blas.jl:119 in dotc at linalg/blas.jl:152 in Ac_mul_B at linalg/matmul.jl:61 in anonymous at no file:10 in runtests at /usr/share/julia/test/testdefs.jl:5 in anonymous at multi.jl:855 in run_work_thunk at multi.jl:621 in anonymous at task.jl:855 while loading linalg3.jl, in expression starting on line 4 ERROR: ccall: could not find function cblas_cdotc_sub in library libblas in anonymous at task.jl:1367 while loading linalg3.jl, in expression starting on line 4 while loading /usr/share/julia/test/runtests.jl, in expression starting on line 39 ERROR: A test has failed. Please submit a bug report including error messages above and the output of versioninfo(): Julia Version 0.3.6 Commit 0c24dca (2015-02-17 22:12 UTC) Platform Info: System: Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 BLAS: libblas LAPACK: liblapack LIBM: libm LLVM: libLLVM-3.3 in error at error.jl:21 in runtests at interactiveutil.jl:370 in runtests at interactiveutil.jl:359 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
Thursday, 26 March 2015, 19:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Thursday, 26 March 2015, 19:16 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
exception on 3: ERROR: test failed: gamma(1:25) == gamma(Float64[1:25])
in error at error.jl:21
in default_handler at test.jl:19
in do_test at test.jl:39
in runtests at /usr/share/julia/test/testdefs.jl:5
in anonymous at multi.jl:855
in run_work_thunk at multi.jl:621
in anonymous at task.jl:855
while loading math.jl, in expression starting on line 174
ERROR: test failed: gamma(1:25) == gamma(Float64[1:25])
in anonymous at task.jl:1367
while loading math.jl, in expression starting on line 174
while loading /usr/share/julia/test/runtests.jl, in expression starting on line 39
ERROR: A test has failed. Please submit a bug report including error messages
above and the output of versioninfo():
Julia Version 0.3.7
Commit cb9bcae (2015-03-23 21:36 UTC)
Platform Info:
System: Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3360 @ 2.83GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
BLAS: libopenblas (DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Penryn)
LAPACK: libopenblas
LIBM: libm
LLVM: libLLVM-3.3
in error at error.jl:21
in runtests at interactiveutil.jl:370
in runtests at interactiveutil.jl:359
julia>
Not sure if it is an improvement or not.
Closing this bug.