Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#43946 - Pacman 4.2 symlinking support
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Aleksei (yupi) - Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 11:54 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 13:32 GMT
Opened by Aleksei (yupi) - Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 11:54 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 13:32 GMT
|
DetailsSimply put: refusing to follow symlinks when installing packages does not solve the problem with conflicts because every symlink can be simulated with bind mount.
But symlinks are better than bind mounts because they know where they link. I understand the need to disable symlink following after dropping complex symlink conflict checking, so that the old packages would not spoil the system. But once the packages are fixed, there is no need not to allow symlink following, at least via some option. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 13:32 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: These will never come back
Wednesday, 25 February 2015, 13:32 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: These will never come back