Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#43469 - {archweb} pacman's "Bug Reports" link should link to the "Pacman" project instead of "Arch Linux"
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by (Det) - Friday, 16 January 2015, 11:05 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 22 January 2015, 15:06 GMT
Opened by (Det) - Friday, 16 January 2015, 11:05 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Thursday, 22 January 2015, 15:06 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
The "Bug Reports" links in: - https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/pacman/ - https://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/pacman/ should use the project url "project=3" instead of "project=1". |
This task depends upon
Closed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
Thursday, 22 January 2015, 15:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: See comment. We don't link other package so the upstream bug tracker, why should we with pacman?
Thursday, 22 January 2015, 15:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: See comment. We don't link other package so the upstream bug tracker, why should we with pacman?

I disagree. All packaging bugs for Core and Extra packages, including pacman, should go in the Arch Linux project. Problems with pacman itself go to the Pacman project, just like other upstream problems to to their respective upstream bug trackers.