Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#42601 - [pacman] pacman --noconfirm does not handle multiple package providers very well.
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Yichao Yu (yuyichao) - Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 17:59 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 23:36 GMT
Opened by Yichao Yu (yuyichao) - Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 17:59 GMT
Last edited by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) - Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 23:36 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Pacman does not install the correct packages in the following situation. a1: provides a; conflicts a a2: provides a; conflicts a b1: provides b; conflicts b; depends a1 b2: provides b; conflicts b; depends a2 When running $ pacman --noconfirm -S a1 b Depend on the order appears in the database. pacman may install b2 a2 instead of b1 a1 if b2 is in from of b1. The same behavior can be seen when a1/2, b1/2's are the same package with different version requirements. This situation can be caused by compiling packages in chroot that are linked to two versions of a library with different ABIs. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon