FS#42560 - [intel-ucode]: Probably outdated package
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Martin Schnitkemper (Martin-MS) - Sunday, 26 October 2014, 09:18 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Sunday, 26 October 2014, 10:29 GMT
Opened by Martin Schnitkemper (Martin-MS) - Sunday, 26 October 2014, 09:18 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Sunday, 26 October 2014, 10:29 GMT
|
Details
Description:
~~~~~~~~~~~ Microcode-Update on boot reports revision 0x1b from 2014-05-29 while Intel offers an update 2014-09-13. The current packages has been build on 2014-10-12. Additional info: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On boot I get | [ 0.000000] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29 | [ 0.082057] CPU1 microcode updated early to revision 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29 | [ 0.317017] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x2, revision=0x1b | [ 0.317021] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x2, revision=0x1b | [ 0.317027] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x2, revision=0x1b | [ 0.317032] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306a9, pf=0x2, revision=0x1b | [ 0.317072] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba but after I rebuild the package again from source I got, inter alia, these messages | signature: 0x306a9 | flags: 0x12 | revision: 0x1b | date: 2014-05-29 | size: 12288 | | signature: 0x306f2 | flags: 0x6f | revision: 0x29 | date: 2014-09-03 | size: 28672 Steps to reproduce: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Compare intel-ucode.img against the current file and that you got after rebuilding the package. I am not sure if just the wrong revision and date is reported or if we are just on an outdated microcode. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) -
Sunday, 26 October 2014, 10:14 GMT
If it's really outdated please flag the pkg out-of-date.