FS#42445 - [lightdm] [sddm] conflicting file
            Attached to Project:
            Community Packages
            
Opened by kkl2401 (kkl2401) - Sunday, 19 October 2014, 08:37 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday, 18 August 2015, 08:59 GMT
          Opened by kkl2401 (kkl2401) - Sunday, 19 October 2014, 08:37 GMT
Last edited by Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday, 18 August 2015, 08:59 GMT
| 
 | Details
                    Description: Both packages contain
                    /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf. Additional info: lightdm 1:1.12.0-2 sddm-0.10.0-2 Steps to reproduce: Install lightdm and then run: $ sudo pacman -S sddm resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Packages (1): sddm-0.10.0-2 Total Installed Size: 5.61 MiB :: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] (1/1) checking keys in keyring [##########################################] 100% (1/1) checking package integrity [##########################################] 100% (1/1) loading package files [##########################################] 100% (1/1) checking for file conflicts [##########################################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) sddm: /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. $ pacman -Qo /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf is owned by lightdm 1:1.12.0-2 | 
              This task depends upon
              
              
            
            
          
            Closed by  Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd)
Tuesday, 18 August 2015, 08:59 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: sddm 0.11.0-3
lightdm 1:1.14.2-2
          
        Tuesday, 18 August 2015, 08:59 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: sddm 0.11.0-3
lightdm 1:1.14.2-2
 Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) -
            Sunday, 19 October 2014, 16:33 GMT
            
            Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) -
            Sunday, 19 October 2014, 16:33 GMT
          
           
          
              I guess we should both provide a virtual 'display-manager' package
              and conflicts with it.
            
           Comment by
            Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Monday,
            20 October 2014, 09:57 GMT
            
            Comment by
            Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Monday,
            20 October 2014, 09:57 GMT
          
           
          
              Agreed, I just pushed lightdm-1:1.12.1-1 with this change.
            
           Comment by Johannes Jordan (FoPref) -
            Saturday, 18 July 2015, 14:57 GMT
            
            Comment by Johannes Jordan (FoPref) -
            Saturday, 18 July 2015, 14:57 GMT
          
           
          - Field changed: Percent Complete (100% → 0%)
              The conflicting state of lightdm and sddm just because of this
              file, which is identical, is suboptimal. lightdm includes
              "dm-tool" which also works with sddm. "dm-tool" is the only tool
              that I know of that allows to start new greeters in sddm from a
              plain window manager setup, e.g. fluxbox.
            
           Comment by
            Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday,
            28 July 2015, 22:21 GMT
            
            Comment by
            Maxime Gauduin (Alucryd) - Tuesday,
            28 July 2015, 22:21 GMT
          
           
          
              It seems debian solved the conflict by renaming
              "/etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf" to
              "/etc/dbus-1/system.d/sddm_org.freedesktop.DisplayManager.conf" in
              their sddm package. I'm not really keen on making a split package
              just for dm-tool so I suggest we mimic debian here.
            
           Comment by
            Balló György (City-busz) - Friday,
            31 July 2015, 17:23 GMT
            
            Comment by
            Balló György (City-busz) - Friday,
            31 July 2015, 17:23 GMT
          
           
          
              +1 for renaming. Until both DMs implement the same D-Bus
              interface, it shouldn't be a problem.
            
           Comment by Johannes Jordan (FoPref) -
            Friday, 31 July 2015, 20:59 GMT
            
            Comment by Johannes Jordan (FoPref) -
            Friday, 31 July 2015, 20:59 GMT
          
           
          
              As a matter of fact, they do implement the same interface. That's
              why the files are identical.
            
          