Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#41484 - [spring] Why not use the XX version number instead of 0.XX
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by James Duley (parched) - Wednesday, 06 August 2014, 06:09 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Thursday, 07 August 2014, 12:53 GMT
Opened by James Duley (parched) - Wednesday, 06 August 2014, 06:09 GMT
Last edited by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro) - Thursday, 07 August 2014, 12:53 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Is there any reason to keep using the old 0.XX version numbering system? Maybe for the next release we could change? Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: |
This task depends upon
Closed by Sven-Hendrik Haase (Svenstaro)
Thursday, 07 August 2014, 12:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: will fix in next release
Thursday, 07 August 2014, 12:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: will fix in next release