Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#4068 - Spamd parameters

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Giacomo Rizzo (alt-os) - Monday, 27 February 2006, 02:27 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Monday, 27 February 2006, 13:06 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Dale Blount (dale)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7.1 Noodle
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

I'm experiencing a little problem with the spamassassing package, and in particular, with the spamd configuration.
In the rc.d script, the "-d" parameter is put _before_ optional parameters. In this way, I actually can't stard spamd with the -L option (that make possible to start it even if the network is not already up) as I could do if it was the last parameter.
   spamd.patch (0.3 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dale Blount (dale)
Saturday, 11 November 2006, 20:18 GMT
Reason for closing:  Works for me
Additional comments about closing:  WFM using current version.
Comment by Dale Blount (dale) - Monday, 27 February 2006, 13:07 GMT
The position of the -d parameter should not matter. If it does, it's probably an upstream bug.

I'm positive I've used -L in the conf.d file before and it has worked for me even though the -d is in the rc.d script.
Comment by Giacomo Rizzo (alt-os) - Monday, 27 February 2006, 14:21 GMT
It's true. I did a test before posting, and actually seemed to work, but I tryed again a few minute ago, and it effectively don't work.
It seems to be a spamassassin bug ( http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4591 ).

Loading...