Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#40474 - [jenkins] build from source instead of downloading prebuilt
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Joel Teichroeb (klusark) - Tuesday, 20 May 2014, 18:58 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 06 June 2020, 15:06 GMT
Opened by Joel Teichroeb (klusark) - Tuesday, 20 May 2014, 18:58 GMT
Last edited by Morten Linderud (Foxboron) - Saturday, 06 June 2020, 15:06 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I don't think it makes any difference in the end, but I don't see any downside to building from source. I attached a pkgbuild that builds from source. I've got it running and everything seems to be the same as ever. |
This task depends upon
java-jline
antlr4
clojure
ca-certificates-java
Personally, I think it's worth it as it is better than downloading a pre built version.
> Personally, I think it's worth it as it is better than downloading a pre built version.
These two statements seem at odds with each other. Perhaps you could clarify your position with actual reasons, rather than "I think".
I don't actually work with Java generally so I am not aware of any linking issues that could happen like would be the case with c based programs.