Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#40253 - [ati-dri] Significant performance regression in Mesa 10.1.2-1
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Andrew D. (andrewd18) - Tuesday, 06 May 2014, 23:54 GMT
Last edited by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Wednesday, 07 May 2014, 06:47 GMT
Opened by Andrew D. (andrewd18) - Tuesday, 06 May 2014, 23:54 GMT
Last edited by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Wednesday, 07 May 2014, 06:47 GMT
|
DetailsAfter upgrading to Mesa 10.1.2-1 from Mesa 10.1.1-2, users reported significant performance regressions. See: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=181171 I was also able to recreate this using my ATI HD6850 and Europa Universalis 4, Unigine Valley benchmark, and other OpenGL applications. So far this seems to be limited to ATI cards.
Downgrading to 10.1.1-2 resolved the issue. Steps to reproduce: * Use an ATI video card * Use Radeon open-source graphics * Upgrade to Mesa 10.1.2-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy)
Wednesday, 07 May 2014, 06:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Wednesday, 07 May 2014, 06:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
also fixes the problem
as it looks like a glibc version mismatch
This is not our bug. You must remove libstdc++.so.6 from steam runtime, replacing it is useless.