Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#39947 - [go] optional dependencies typo
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Steven Noonan (neunon) - Friday, 18 April 2014, 17:12 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 21:15 GMT
Opened by Steven Noonan (neunon) - Friday, 18 April 2014, 17:12 GMT
Last edited by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) - Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 21:15 GMT
|
DetailsJust a nitpick about the 'go' package in community. The optdepends list shows:
--- Optional dependencies for go mercurial: for fetching sources from mercurial repositories [installed] git: for fetching sources from git repositories [installed] bzr: for fetching sources from bazaar repositories [installed] svn: for fetching sources from subversion repositories --- The package for svn is 'subversion', not 'svn'. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto)
Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 21:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 21:15 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) -
Monday, 21 April 2014, 21:20 GMT
Thanks for reporting. svn seems to work as well, since subversion provides svn, but I will consider changing it.
Comment by Steven Noonan (neunon) -
Monday, 21 April 2014, 21:22 GMT
Well, in the example above, I had the 'subversion' package installed, but the 'svn' line doesn't have '[installed]' at the end -- so the provides isn't being accounted for in the check...
Comment by Alexander F. Rødseth (xyproto) -
Tuesday, 22 April 2014, 20:03 GMT
Ok. I think pacman should have handled this and said "installed" if a package that provided the optdep in question was installed. But sure, updated the package. It will appear in [community] shortly.