Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#39887 - [zathura-pdf-mupdf] mupdf should be makedepends only

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by cupcake (muffins) - Tuesday, 15 April 2014, 23:05 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 15:33 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion)
Daniel Wallace (gtmanfred)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
mupdf ships a static lib, so zathura-pdf-mupdf does not need mupdf to be installed in order to operate
This task depends upon

Closed by  Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 15:33 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 09:35 GMT
Actually I'm shipping static library in mupdf only because zathura-pdf-mupdf can't use shared one…
Comment by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 10:34 GMT
How can I build mupdf which provides .so? I'll try to fix zathura-pdf-mupdf.
Comment by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 10:45 GMT
Hm, I don't think it's possible with default Makefile. I'll check if I can bypass it. I'm adding myself to assignees not to forget about it.
Comment by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 11:27 GMT
If it is not supported by upstream may be it would be better to move mupdf to makedeps as suggested or contact mupdf upstream?
Comment by Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 14:04 GMT
Yes, moving mupdf to makedeps in the meantime is a good idea.

Loading...